The Stoic sign and the pragmatic or implicit premises in the formal theories

Miguel López-Astorga

Resumo


The current formal theories trying to account for reasoning and language often need to resort to the thesis of the pragmatic or implicit premises to explain the real role pragmatics plays in the human inferential activity. The main aim of this paper is to show that, although they did not propose theories in this way, the Stoics, by means of their concept of ‘sign’, already offered the essential arguments and foundations necessary to describe the real action of both pragmatics and the premises coming from general knowledge when we make inferences.

Palavras-chave


Formal theories; Pragmatics; Premises; Reasoning; Stoicism

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Boeri, M. D. & Salles, R. (2014). Los filósofos estoicos. Ontología, lógica, física y ética. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.

Bompastor Borges Dias, M. G. & Roazzi, A. (2003). A teoria da lógica mental: E os estudos empíricos em crianças e adultos. Psicologia em Estudo, 8(1), 45-55.

Braine, M. D. S. & O’Brien, D. P. (Eds.) (1998a). Mental Logic. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Braine, M. D. S. & O’Brien, D. P. (1998b). How to investigate mental logic and the syntax of thought. In M. D. S. Braine & D. P. O’Brien (Eds.), Mental Logic (pp. 45-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Gentzen, G. (1934). Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen I. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39(2), 176-210.

Gentzen, G. (1935). Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen II. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39(3), 405-431.

Gouveia, E. L., Roazzi, A., Moutinho, K., Bompastor Borges Dias, M. G., & O’Brien, D. P. (2002). Raciocínio condicional: influências pragmáticas. Estudos de Psicologia, 7(2), 217-225.

Gouveia, E. L., Roazzi, A., O’Brien, D. P., Moutinho, K., & Bompastor Borges Dias, M. G. (2003). Raciocínio dedutivo e lógica mental. Estudos de Psicologia, 20(3), 135-145.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109(4), 646-678.

López-Astorga, M. (2016). Logic, pragmatics, and types of conditionals. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 11(2), 279-297.

López-Astorga, M. (2017). Chrysippus’ indemonstrables and the semantic mental models. Eidos, 26, 302-325.

O’Brien, D. P. (2009). Human reasoning includes a mental logic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 96-97.

O’Brien, D. P. (2014). Conditionals and disjunctions in mental-logic theory: A response to Liu and Chou (2012) and to López-Astorga (2013). Universum, 29(2), 221-235.

O’Brien, D. P. & Li, S. (2013). Mental logic theory: A paradigmatic case of empirical research on the language of thought and inferential role semantics. Journal of Foreign Languages, 36(6), 27-41.

O’Brien, D. P. & Manfrinati, A. (2010). The mental logic theory of conditional proposition. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Cognition and conditionals: Probability and Logic in Human Thinking (pp. 39-54). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

O’Toole, R. R. & Jennings, R. E. (2004). The Megarians and the Stoics. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 1. Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic (pp. 397-522). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.


Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.